Home » » heartagram tattoos

heartagram tattoos

images Heartagram Tattoo Dollarbie heartagram tattoos. tattoo on
  • tattoo on



  • tjayant
    11-20 07:08 PM
    Here is my advice to folks trying to jump job just for $$$, even if the GC situation is bad , money should never be the only factor in moving for another job, plan long term , actually from what I know only startups have good opening but highly unstable so it is a catch 22 for most of the folks, I would suggest if you are in fortune 500 companies and the job is boring and salary is bad stick with it for 2 more years , if you cannot get the GC in the next 1-2 years I dont think you will ever get it, this is applicable for folks who applied GC during 2003/2004, 3+2=5years , for folks who has applied for GC after 2004 you can do what you want !!., here again look for favorable environment, Govt's change and policy change so make hay while the sun shine !!, so if the policy is favorable even if the job is bad but you can get the GC in 1-2 year i would stick with that company, because you will never know what will happen after 2 years , It looks to me like we might be in a cusp of policy change similar to 1999/2000, if you miss this boat you may have to wait for another 6-7 years. But again if my understanding is correct America is like a ocean and there is room for everyone , so no one need to be scared of GC etc, every one will get it in some form or other eventually , it is only a matter of time. As far myself iam still waiting for LC, but never really bothered about GC during my 9+ years stay , I just did what I wanted , but after 9 years I would like to move to a startup but controlling myself with the above logic !!!, But one good thing about waiting for GC is it made me a better person personally in learning ton's of stuff valuable for long run. so there is always pluses, everybody wants to be a Pirate (do what we wanted like jump job's at the fist obstacle/temptation $$$) but sometimes it is good to be controlled by external factors to get the best of ourselfs.





    wallpaper tattoo on heartagram tattoos. Fable Back heartagram design
  • Fable Back heartagram design



  • angelfire76
    09-28 05:57 PM
    I am one who has got a Master's degree in the US. I want to mention that because that I am proud of that. Just like Immigration Voice is stressing the fact that it is for legal immigrants only, not the illegal ones.

    Anyone who has something to be proud of would want to mention it. Americans like to say "proud to be an American" for the same reason.

    Besides, having finished a graduate degree program in the US is a big contribution to the US either financially and/or academically.

    The most serious issue with the US educated is that when it comes to work that requires a lot of work experience, they are not as competitive as those who went straight to work and has got a lot more work experience. They are only good in coming up with new patents and building new business models. The current immigration system favor those that have more work experience. So that is why the US educated ones are in a disadvantaged position.

    Considering the fact that the US educated have contributed a lot (some up to 6 years or more of their time) to the US financially and/or academically and still in a disadvantaged position, we do need some special treatments.

    Have I made it clear?


    I got a free ride through graduate school, so I should be ashamed that I didn't contribute financially and used tax payer money to convince my advisor to work on pet projects.Academically too they were more proof-of-concept type projects. :D That was a joke. Point taken. :)

    Hmmm..no I would think that you still need BS+5 to qualify for EB2 while you only need BS+1.5 yrs to qualify for EB2. Where do you think the scale is tipped?
    Also how fair is it that a new grad from college joins Microsoft, Intel (no majority of people who work there are not tech studs)etc. where GC sponsorship is a process versus somebody who doesn't have a Master's degree but great engineering skills honed by experience and works for a start-up. The immigration process is loaded against the startups in case you didn't know. I've seen too many real life scenarios of the above to be convinced otherwise.

    But let's not beat a dead horse and invite the wrath of admins or senior members.





    heartagram tattoos. heartagram tattoo. heartagram
  • heartagram tattoo. heartagram



  • ndbhatt
    02-15 01:26 PM
    now what the hell is ROW and ICMP ?

    ROW = Rest Of World
    ICMP = India, China, Mexico and Phillipines





    2011 Fable Back heartagram design heartagram tattoos. heartagram tattoos 2009
  • heartagram tattoos 2009



  • swo
    08-16 01:38 AM
    I am wondering what part RD will paly in this new visa bulletin. In may case, I have PD of April 2002 (EB3-ROW) but RD of March 2007.

    I guess they will still go by RD and I have to wait for 5-6 months. Please correct me If I am wrong?

    You are in GREAT shape. You are current as of September. As long as there is no retrogression you should be good as soon as your security checks are cleared.

    A 6 months wait is not unreasonable. I'd be happy with that if I was you!



    more...


    heartagram tattoos. wallpaper of heartagram tattoo
  • wallpaper of heartagram tattoo



  • catchupvijay
    06-11 02:01 PM
    Thanks!





    heartagram tattoos. got the Heartagram tattoo,
  • got the Heartagram tattoo,



  • pappu
    07-01 10:22 PM
    Info on the lawsuit by AILA:
    ==============
    USCIS VISA BULLETIN/
    VISA AVAILABILTY LAWSUIT
    Frequently Asked Questions about Participating in this Lawsuit
    AILF is considering filing a lawsuit in federal district court against the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) over its rejection of otherwise properly filed adjustment of status applications for the alleged reason that a visa was not available, even though the Visa Bulletin from the Department of State (DOS) states that a visa was available at the time of filing.
    Any foreign national who is otherwise eligible for adjustment of status and whose adjustment of status application has been or will be returned or rejected solely on this basis may be eligible to be a plaintiff in this lawsuit. If you are considering being a participant in this lawsuit, you may find the following frequently asked questions and answers helpful.
    Q: What is AILF?
    A: The American Immigration Law Foundation (AILF) is a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting the rights of immigrants and refugees and to securing fair and just application and administration of the U.S. immigration laws. In order to achieve these goals, AILF sometimes files lawsuits involving various aspects of immigration law.
    Q: What is this lawsuit about?
    A: This lawsuit will be filed by plaintiffs who have been harmed because USCIS rejected or returned or is expected to reject or return a properly submitted adjustment of status application for the alleged reason that no visa was immediately available even though the DOS Visa Bulletin states that a visa was available at that time.
    To be eligible for adjustment to lawful permanent resident status, a foreign national must show that a visa number is “immediately available.” USCIS regulations state that the DOS Visa Bulletin is used to determine whether a visa number is immediately available. This Bulletin is published once a month and lists the visa availability dates for all categories of immigrants for the following month. Thus, for example, the July 2007 bulletin, listing visa availability dates for the entire month of July, was published in June 2007.
    AILF has learned that USCIS has refused to allow certain adjustment of status applications to be filed even though the DOS Visa Bulletin states that visa numbers are available for the immigrant category at that time. USCIS rejected these applications because DOS informed it in an internal communication that no visa numbers remained for that category of immigrants. To date, this has happened only in the employment-based “other worker” category. We anticipate that it may happen in a number of other types of employment-based immigrant categories beginning in July 2007.
    We believe USCIS violated the law when it failed to apply the visa availability dates listed in the Visa Bulletin, as required by a federal regulation, and instead rejected properly filed adjustment applications. Through this lawsuit, we will challenge the rejection of adjustment of status applications on this basis. We will ask the court to order USCIS to accept the rejected adjustment applications and treat them as being filed as of the date they originally would have been filed had USCIS not rejected them.
    Q: What is a “plaintiff” and how do I know if I am eligible to be a “plaintiff” in this lawsuit?
    A: A plaintiff is a person who files a lawsuit against someone else. We are still determining the categories of plaintiffs but an eligible plaintiff for this lawsuit may include:
    [other worker category]
    A foreign national who:
    Submitted an adjustment of status application in the “other worker” category for receipt by USCIS in June 2007; and
    Is otherwise eligible for adjustment of status; and
    Did not receive a receipt notice, cancelled check, or notice of approval of the adjustment application.
    [other employment-based categories]
    A foreign national who:
    Submitted an adjustment of status application in any employment-based category other than “other worker” for receipt by USCIS in July 2007; and
    Is otherwise eligible for adjustment of status; and
    Did not receive a receipt notice, cancelled check, or notice of approval of the adjustment application.
    Q: Why should I be a plaintiff in this lawsuit?
    2
    A: If the lawsuit is successful, USCIS should accept your adjustment application and treat it as if it had been filed as of the date that you originally tried to file it. Because your adjustment application will then be considered to be pending before the agency, you may be eligible for interim benefits, including an employment authorization document, advance parole, and others.
    What the lawsuit will not do is make a visa number immediately available to you if none is available. If the visa numbers have in fact been used for the current fiscal year, the court does not have the authority under the law to make a new number available to you. However, if the court orders that USCIS accept your adjustment application as of the date that you originally tried to file it, you will be at an earlier place in line when visa numbers become available again in the next fiscal year, October 1, 2007. Additionally, as mentioned, you may be eligible for interim benefits while you are waiting.
    Q: What is likely to happen because of the suit?
    A: Lawsuits are uncertain by nature. We cannot predict the exact outcome. However, other efforts to resolve these problems with USCIS have not succeeded. For this reason, we believe that a lawsuit is the only remaining possible way to resolve these problems.
    Q: Will being a plaintiff in this lawsuit hurt my chances for permanent residence?
    A: If an individual is otherwise legally entitled to have an application granted, the government cannot lawfully deny that application on the basis that the person is participating or participated in a lawsuit. If we believed the government was taking such action, we would complain to the lawyers representing the government and to the judge handling the case. In our experience, this retaliation has not happened.
    Please be aware, though, that USCIS is likely to examine plaintiffs’ adjustment of status applications more closely than it otherwise might. It may ask the plaintiffs questions and ask for additional information about their adjustment applications or immigration status. See below regarding “discovery.”
    Q: How much time must plaintiffs spend on this lawsuit?
    A: Plaintiffs will have to provide us with the information and documentation we need in order to prepare the lawsuit. AILF will do most of the work in the lawsuit on paper. Depending on how the case proceeds, the government and its attorneys may want to ask the plaintiffs some questions about their case, either through written questions and answers or in person. This is called “discovery.” One type of discovery is a “deposition,” which is an interview where parties are asked questions about their cases.
    Depositions are possible but not common in this type of case. In the event that discovery and/or depositions were required, an AILF attorney or an attorney working with us would assist plaintiffs to comply with any discovery requests, and would appear with plaintiffs at any deposition at no charge (see below). At a later stage, a plaintiff may be required to be present at
    3
    a hearing or a trial and possibly be asked to testify about their particular case, but this is quite rare.
    Q: Will it cost me anything to be a plaintiff in this lawsuit?
    A: AILF and any co-counsel will not charge any attorney’s fees for representing individuals in this lawsuit. AILF and any co-counsel also will pay the costs and expenses associated with the lawsuit, such as filing fees, copying, long distance calls, travel expenses for AILF attorneys and staff, depositions, transcripts, etc. In the unlikely event that an individual should be required to be present at a deposition, hearing or a trial, we may ask that he/she pay their own travel and lodging expenses, if any. Those expenses would be reimbursed if the lawsuit is successful and we recover costs.
    Q: Will anyone know that I am a plaintiff in this lawsuit?
    A: Lawsuits are public information, and are available as a public court document. Many courts now have lawsuits and other documents available electronically, accessible via the internet. Also, USCIS will, of course, know the identity of the plaintiffs. We also will discuss plaintiffs’ cases with any other lawyers working with us on the lawsuit. It also is possible that the media – newspapers, radio, or TV reporters – will see the court documents and decide to do a story on the lawsuit.
    Q: What should I do if I am eligible and interested in being a plaintiff in the lawsuit?
    A: Please quickly submit the Questionnaire for Potential Plaintiffs and send us the documents requested. If you do not have the Questionnaire, please send an email to visabulletin@ailf.org, and we will send it to you. You may also fax a request to AILF LAC at (202) 742-5619. Please indicate this is a question about the visa bulletin litigation.
    If you have any questions that are not answered by this FAQ or the questionnaire, please send them to visabulletin@ailf.org or fax to (202) 742-65619, and we will respond. Thank you!
    ===============



    more...


    heartagram tattoos. heartagram tattoos. me and my
  • heartagram tattoos. me and my



  • sbabunle
    01-28 12:43 AM
    Rajuram
    You got couple of things wrong here. Passing a legislation is not a piece
    of cake. It would take sometimes years persistent effort. Contributing
    a few hundred or even a thousand dollars and expecting everything to be
    changed would be too ridiculous. Several tech lobbies are also lobbying
    hard for similar things. And they spend money in millions. Any man with commonsense could understand how difficult things if those powerful business could not take care this.

    Now u may ask, if these tech lobbies cannot take care of it how could a small group like us do it? Last year when CIR was passed in the senate, there was a catch int. It would have imposed hard country quota. With IVs work we were able to remove that hard cap clause from the bill. The bottom line is that we may not be able to pass a huge bill, but we could get sevearl smaller bills in peacemeals that would help our cause.

    If we keep on working on it, eventually some doors will open for us. But nobody is not sure when thats going to happen. So here is my take on this whole drama. I'll support IV for next 3 years. And if nothing happens I'll pack my bags. :D :D :D

    Now good luck on your GC





    I (and may be lot of others like me) want to care about IV & want to contribute to IV. But there has not even a single thread of good news for last several months. This is very demotivating. I have contributed only once. Every time I visit this site, I feel guilty of taking a free ride. But at the same time I find it hard to make any contributions with nothing happening on the horizon. Currently it looks like what ever is happening or going to happen with CIR etc is just moving at its own pace. If we can not expedite it, then what is the use? in any case congress will pass some relief for skilled workers when CIR comes up.





    2010 heartagram tattoo. heartagram heartagram tattoos. Heartagram Tattoo Dollarbie
  • Heartagram Tattoo Dollarbie



  • sreeraghu
    09-19 09:36 AM
    First, I would like to congratulate everyone who contributed to the success of the DC rally on Sep 18, 2007...

    I was there and I am proud of our ImmigrationVoice members for this FANTASTIC effort!

    We are just starting and taking baby steps with these kind of activities...So, anything I mention below is not a critic, but a humble feedback/opinion...Please don't get offended.


    1. We must immediately change our name to LegalImmigrationVoice.org( LIV.org)...But still Immigrationvoice.org should work....This should be done ASAP...like within next week...Please conduct a poll for this ASAP.


    2. We must/should always wear formal suits for these kind of rally....this would definitely give us a very high status and definitely there will not be any confusion if the rally is by legal or illegal immigrants. Even if it is hot summer, we must stick to this dress code...


    3. In all the signs we had today, we need to have one line clearly in bold as "Legal Immigrants - LegalImmigrationVoice.com - Faster Green cards for Legal highly skilled Immigrants" - bold and clear..

    Also, all our T-shirts should have
    "Legal Immigrants - LegalImmigrationVoice.com - Faster Green cards for Legal highly skilled Immigrants" in the back

    4. One of the rally participants told me that a guide was telling a tourists bus passengers quote "these folks are illegal immigrants...", the rally participant who heard this went to the guide and explained that we are legal immigrants...if you think the guide is not smart enough to read our signs and understand that we are legal immigrants, read next point...

    5. On the rally route, one gentleman, who was dressed in suit, looked well educated came up to me and asked what we are concerned about...I told him that green card process for Legal Immigrants is taking between 5-10 years and we are requesting to expedite it.....so it is clear that all our signs need this text at the bottom "Legal Immigrants - LegalImmigrationVoice.com - Faster Green cards for Legal highly skilled Immigrants"


    We cannot be perfect the first or second time....Lets learn from this rally....


    A pat in the back to all those who attended the rally....

    Good Luck

    Legal Immigrants Rally

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...76080420003555


    http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...20059427058009

    http://picasaweb.google.com/raghumoh...lyWashingtonDC

    Happy viewing, Foward to your friends n family

    --
    Regards,
    Raghu



    more...


    heartagram tattoos. my heartagram tattoo P
  • my heartagram tattoo P



  • ajju
    02-20 03:55 PM
    Ok guys before you shoot it down heres my calc for EB2 pending apps from 2000 to Dec 2003. Obviously its a rough estimate, who knows how many eb3s switched, labor subs etc etc etc.

    From pending apps from 2000 to 2003 dec are about 96. Assume represents 1% of total population so it would be 9600. Each app has about 1.5 dependents so about 15,000? If you assume as lower say 0.5% then number would obviously increase to 29,000.

    Ok now shoot me down.


    Good calculation... On brighter side.. if I assume being 2%.. the numbers would be 7500.. Hope its enough to clear out with just the extra EB1 quotas in this quarter.. And then, next quarter we see some more progress for EB2 India.. Just a wishful thinking...





    hair heartagram tattoos 2009 heartagram tattoos. My heartagram tattoo
  • My heartagram tattoo



  • bheemi123
    10-03 01:33 PM
    My wife is on L-1 currently and has an approved H-1b petition from company B which is a "change of status" effective October 01.

    We would like to stick to the L-1 for some more time and from what I gather one way of doing it is for her to travel out of the country and move back in.

    What other options do we have?

    Thanks

    that is the only ption to continue L status..but remember u can not use h1b ..and u have to apply again for h1b in next year quota....



    more...


    heartagram tattoos. HIM Heartagram Tattoo by ~mandychronic on deviantART
  • HIM Heartagram Tattoo by ~mandychronic on deviantART



  • PresidentO
    02-03 05:07 PM
    So naive of you to think that Senator-elect (Is she sworn in yet?) Gillibrand would be the person to do this. She is already labeled a flip flopper for courting hispanic groups.

    AFAIK, The 8 year wait time she was referring to was not EB wait times. That was posted here on IV, discussed and proved that she was talking in general. Actions speak louder than talk. Talk is free, action is risk for politicians.

    Good luck!





    hot wallpaper of heartagram tattoo heartagram tattoos. heartagram tattoo by
  • heartagram tattoo by



  • singhsa3
    02-21 02:41 PM
    Assuming you are right then,
    average visa issued for EB1 ROW+Non ROW over the last 5 years have been 26K,
    Now assuming this year the demand would be close to average then. It leaves 14K for EB2
    Implying 12/2003 dates movement is very likely as 14k>5k (your number)
    I can share some estimates for EB2 India through Dec03. I wish had the cases as a database, Then we could query for all dates.

    Column 1: PD
    Column 2: Nbr. Of EB2 India pending from
    Column 3: Estimated Universe of EB2 India Pending ( to Universe ratio of 6.75%)
    Column 4: Cumulative EB2 India pending

    2000-01 0 - -
    2000-03 0 - -
    2000-04 1 15 15
    2000-06 1 15 30
    2000-08 0 - 30
    2000-11 1 15 44
    2000-12 0 - 44
    2001-01 0 - 44
    2001-03 1 15 59
    2001-04 3 44 104
    2001-05 2 30 133
    2001-06 6 89 222
    2001-07 3 44 267
    2001-08 1 15 281
    2001-09 1 15 296
    2001-10 6 89 385
    2001-11 2 30 415
    2001-12 2 30 444
    2002-01 5 74 519
    2002-02 4 59 578
    2002-03 1 15 593
    2002-04 3 44 637
    2002-05 11 163 800
    2002-06 7 104 904
    2002-07 5 74 978
    2002-08 5 74 1,052
    2002-09 5 74 1,126
    2002-10 14 207 1,333
    2002-11 16 237 1,570
    2002-12 11 163 1,733
    2003-01 13 193 1,926
    2003-02 12 178 2,104
    2003-03 20 296 2,400
    2003-04 13 193 2,593
    2003-05 16 237 2,830
    2003-06 17 252 3,081
    2003-07 22 326 3,407
    2003-08 18 267 3,674
    2003-09 18 267 3,941
    2003-10 29 430 4,370
    2003-11 17 252 4,622
    2003-12 18 267 4,889
    Total 330 4,889



    more...


    house Sexy Heartagram Tattoo heartagram tattoos. heartagram tattoos 2009
  • heartagram tattoos 2009



  • sri1309
    03-09 10:17 PM
    Both 1A and 2A category for Family Based (sons, daughters, spouse - of citizens and green card holders) has better dates (15th Aug 02, 15th Aug 2004) than EB-2 India, and EB-3 India.

    This is so preposterous, words cannot even begin to describe this absurdity.

    So those of us who have been in U.S. for almost a decade, have been contributing to this society, and have held our life in constant limbo, are being given a lower priority than those who are still back in their own country and living a happy life and who can now immigrate to U.S. based on family immigration.

    Do the lawmakers have no common sense left atall??

    You have a good point, but did you write this to atleast one lawmaker. Everybody here has very good ideas, but there seems to be something missing. We need to act. This is the time to write again.





    tattoo got the Heartagram tattoo, heartagram tattoos. Heartagram Tattoos by
  • Heartagram Tattoos by



  • nozerd
    01-27 10:47 AM
    I went back and reread the July 2001 Bulletin.
    How difficult would it be to lobby for extending the same logic for removing per country cap ? I am sure removing 7% cap would definitely help.

    Also since EB3 World has a cut off does it mean that no visas will be left from the world pool which can be recaptured ?



    more...


    pictures heartagram tattoos. me and my heartagram tattoos. images Heartagram Tattoo heartagram tattoo. heartagram tattoos. heartagram
  • images Heartagram Tattoo heartagram tattoo. heartagram tattoos. heartagram



  • HOPE_GC_SOON
    11-20 05:05 PM
    Hi LWPD

    Thanks for your Posting of this URL.

    The URL is no more active and please help me forwarding the specified .pdf file either a PM to me or please attach the same to your reply.

    Alternatively, if you can describe the path on USCIS site, that would be of great help.. I doubt they still hold that .pdf file on site. If you had downloaded this .pdf file. Please help the Team.

    Thanks


    You guys won't believe how glad I am to read a few posts here where some people are standing up for themselves and refusing to take bullshit from certain lousy employers. This will send a message to those kinds of employers that they can't use the immigration system and treat employees like shit while continuing to profit from these hard-working people.

    abc, just one suggestion for you. If you can, hold off until your I-140 gets approved. Once that happens, your 2003 priority date will stick and you can take it with you ( USCIS internal I-140 adjudication manual for your reference ... http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrel...h22_091206R.pdf )

    I wish you all the best with your life.

    lwpd





    dresses heartagram tattoo by heartagram tattoos. Heartagram Tattoo Design by
  • Heartagram Tattoo Design by



  • Suva
    11-11 12:57 AM
    Good one...

    PCS - What you are suffering from is known as PVBS (Post Visa Bulletin Syndrome). It is very common in Indian and Chinese community living in the US.

    This condition stays with the patient/sufferer for 15 days or so and then disappears like a f*a*r*t in the wind. It is more likely to happen to those who fall under EB-2 category and especially those who are 6 months or so from priority date to be current. This condition keeps re-appearing till the patient gets green card and then it gives birth to another condition call PGCS (Post Green Card Syndrome). Typically, that condition lasts for 5 years till the patient gets US citizenship. There are some documented evidences that Amway and QuickStar have tried to fix this condition but medical community is yet to approve that.

    Laughter is the only known cure of this condition. Returning back to home country can also cure this condition.



    more...


    makeup my heartagram tattoo P heartagram tattoos. Sexy Heartagram Tattoo
  • Sexy Heartagram Tattoo



  • ItIsNotFunny
    10-15 04:40 PM
    Guys,

    It was just a suggestion. If we together decide after analysis that this is not a good idea, we can divert our energy to something that is more productive.

    By the way, I already got few red flowers (red dots) :)





    girlfriend Heartagram Tattoos by heartagram tattoos. Tora#39;s heartagram tattoo
  • Tora#39;s heartagram tattoo



  • amitpan007
    06-06 04:31 PM
    Hi bodhi_tree and amitpan007,

    Were there any LUD's on your application before the approval?

    Thanks.

    No LUDS since 20-JUL-07 for FP.





    hairstyles HIM Heartagram Tattoo by ~mandychronic on deviantART heartagram tattoos. Tattoo heartagram with roses
  • Tattoo heartagram with roses



  • javadeveloper
    12-11 11:52 AM
    All of us (people on L-1, F-1, J-1, H1, B1, K1 and their derivatives....) went to US consulate to request for VISA. US consulate never came to your door with a VISA.

    Everyone goes to Bank and do transactions , that doesn't mean that we only need Bank and Bank doesn't need us and our deposits.





    new_horizon
    06-10 04:08 PM
    Done





    godspeed
    06-14 11:41 AM
    Senator Saxby Chambliss has voted against the original Senate version of H.R. 4213



    Share this article :

    Post a Comment

     
    Support : Venus Net | Pagak City
    Copyright © 2014. miranda lambert hairstyles - All Rights Reserved
    Template Created by Together Published by Venus Net
    Proudly powered by Blogger